

Local political observers like blogger Hillary Brown want to know more about Tuesday night’s vote to delay a $2.7 million renovation of the old Athens First building next to City Hall for a Public Utilities Department customer service center.
I will try to oblige.
There are some underground politics going on here that briefly emerged during an exchange between commissioners David Lynn and Andy Herod.
Lynn had made a motion to approve the renovations minus a drive-through window. Commissioner Kelly Girtz made a motion to hold off, seconded by Herod, arguing that they could make better use of the space if another department occupied the building along with PUD.
After some back-and-forth, a clearly exasperated Lynn said Girtz’ argument “sounds less like rational thought and more like a grudge against the Public Utilities Department.”
Herod replied, “It seems to me that what’s driving this is who’s got the money and not necessarily who’s got the need.”
A lot of agencies – including the tax assessor, tax commissioner, computer folks and Public Works Department, along with PUD – have a need, according to county studies on overcrowded offices. But it’s true that only PUD has the money.
Some commissioners, most notably Carl Jordan, have often chafed at PUD’s independence, viewing the 195-employee department with its $26 million annual operating budget and essentially unlimited capital funds as director Gary Duck’s personal fiefdom. They have tried to exercise more oversight for years and rarely succeed.
And here is where we arrive at the murky waters.
Plunging ahead, PUD is an enterprise fund, meaning it’s entirely separate from the rest of the county budget. Water and sewer charges fund water and sewer, nothing else. Trash pickup fees fund the Solid Waste Department, nothing else. Neither one gets any property or sales taxes, just fees for service. Because people tend to pay more attention to their property taxes than their water bills, this rule is to stop the commission from, say, jacking up water rates to build parks.
Therefore, while it’s technically possible for PUD to share space with a general-fund department, it would take some seriously complicated accounting to make it work legally. One branch of the government would have to pay back another branch part of the $1.9 million spent to buy the building, and the government would essentially be charging itself rent.
Keep in mind that the general fund – mostly property taxes and sales taxes – will be a sad and barren wasteland for at least the next year or two, thanks to the recession. Finding money where there’s none to send an enterprise fund that’s flush with cash is not going to be easy.
The perception of this vote is that Lynn, Kathy Hoard, George Maxwell and Harry Sims are eager to squander our hard-earned dollars on a project of dubious benefit simply because some bureaucrat told them to.
And so Girtz, Herod, Doug Lowry, Alice Kinman, Mike Hamby and Ed Robinson come off as defenders of the taxpayers’ pocketbooks. In reality, they essentially voted to delay a project that will only get more expensive as time goes on and to find tax money to pay for a complicated scheme that could keep taxpayer-funded lawyers and accountants busy for who knows how long.
It is true, as some commissioners have alluded to, that it is politically far easier to raise water rates than taxes. Perhaps they’ll think of that the next time a rate increase lands on their lap, but I doubt it; the hikes are needed to pay back $200 million in bonds mostly for new sewer plants.
As Lynn has pointed out, ratepayers have already been separated from their $4.6 million and a larger water business office is indisputably needed, so why not just go ahead and build it?
I suspect that’s what they’ll end up doing at their next voting meeting anyway.
Another politician discovers tekmology
Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle is now on Twitter. He hasn’t tweeted or twittered (or whatever) anything newsworthy, unless you count the fact that he’s apparently up at 3:30 in the morning.
- Blake Aued's blog
- Login or register to post comments
"Plunging ahead, PUD is an
"Plunging ahead, PUD is an enterprise fund, meaning it’s entirely separate from the rest of the county budget."
Really, though, this was an artificial division created by the government; in reality, like the GAA, if the Mayor and Commission wanted to shift funds from one department to another, say to address a financial crisis, they could do it. Now some want to hide behind the law, or the accounting rules that underlie the fiefdoms, but that's just a dodge. The fiefdom/enterprise fund accounting trick can generate excellence in a government organization almost at the private enterprise level; it can also lead to misappropriation of funding, power, and generate it's own special public relations efforts. Anyone who wants to join some of our local "leaders" in their hand-wringing over the "independence" of local divisions of the government ought really to run for their offices and let them watch, on Charter TV, the way these independents can surely be brought to heel! It amazes me that even with the high intelligence of our local leaders (and the alleged highly smart journalists ;)), they continue to be led by their noses by gov't insiders who've survived years of insider politics to find themselves in the cat-bird-seat. Now, I'll be all for the fiefdom, the drive-thru (new carpet and paint smell) if they'll just do these three things:
1. Dedicate ALL conservation pricing funds to a special account that can be used ONLY to increase our local water supply; citizens already know we have to conserve -- so save the lecture!
2. Eliminate base charges for water so that, for example, a customer who uses no water in a given month receives a bill for $0.
3. Find a way to measure the overall efficiency of PUD vis a vis other public water utilities; maybe they rank up their as fantastic, or maybe we are all being ripped off. Let's see!
Oh, and PS, Blake --
You've got it exactly backwards again. Critics of the spending see and feel the big picture that us taxpayers see. Those others are useless and should be cut from the herd and put out to pasture, full-time, over to the U.GA. One other little point: Why are you defending the status quo, and the momentum it has? Writ large, that's like defending Wall Street, Housing speculation and all sorts of stuff; real leaders will be looking closely and questioning the conventional wisdom; not following the herd. And maybe that applies to journalists, too, huh?
Under state law, no, the
Under state law, no, the mayor and commission can't shift funds from the water department to the general fund. This was discussed at the meeting last week.
Yes, Blake, they can do
Yes, Blake, they can do this. In fact, it seems like the Commissioners already did it!
Did what?
They didn't do anything except delay a decision for four weeks pending the results of a space assessment study.
We've been through all this stuff about conservation pricing before. It's revenue neutral, capital costs are static, the base charge covers the cost of checking your meter, etc, etc. Do you really want to get into that again? Why don't we talk about the building?
Blake, your blog was very
Blake, your blog was very good in that it got right down to exactly what is going on in a complicated situation. I'd suggest you are missing something very important here: The entire ACC government and it's relationship to the manager has CHANGED! Wow! Or at the very least, we saw a REAL challenge!!
Now what I am suggesting to you is that maybe it is TIME to challenge the conventional wisdom and thinking! (Maybe the fears and concerns of the citizens are beginning to cause real changes at city hall and other political centers) . Athens is certainly not immune to the national and world economic situation. It will be ok, though, in the long-term (and I don't expect my hot water to be interrupted tomorrow morning), but what you detailed very clearly just might represent the kind of new thinking and new leadership that will lead us away from all the economic badness.
http://www.athens-chat.com/vBulletin/showthread.php?t=3461