

U.S. Rep. Paul Broun hates children.
At least, that’s the case GOP challenger Barry Fleming makes in his latest ad, available on YouTube and airing district-wide beginning this morning.
Fleming chastises Broun for voting against H.R. 2517, a bill authorizing funding for missing children; H.R. 3845, which creates a task force to address online child pornography; and H.R. 3791, which requires Internet service providers to report users who upload child pornography. Text, voting records, debate transcripts and summaries are available here if anyone’s interested.
In all three cases, Broun was one of only two or three congressmen to vote against the bills. In the case of H.R. 3791, the SAFE Act, Broun has said he believes it is unconstitutional.
The ad ends a brief cease-fire when both candidates more or less suspended their daily barrage of press releases and verbal sniping. With Fleming on the air, the race is officially on.
Broun to judges: Drop dead
Broun sent out yet another denunciation today of the California gay-marriage decision, which took effect this afternoon.
“The recent ruling from the California Supreme Court is symptomatic of a much deeper and more insidious malignancy, namely, judges who refuse to submit to the rule of law, and are willing to twist the Constitutions of our land to establish an oligarchic tyranny over this nation.,” he said. “The obvious cure for this problem is for the people to reclaim their political power through voting to overturn these heavy-handed rulings.”
In other words, vote for people like me and you won’t have to worry about teh geighs wrecking our family values.
Time for truth
The candidates also sparred over a recent Fleming mailer picturing a girl kneeling by a headstone and attacking Broun for voting against H.R. 2828, a bill to compensate the families of people killed in terrorist attacks abroad. Team Fleming immediately responded. Here’s the blow-by-blow:
• Broun says Fleming’s term “on American soil” implies 9/11, not the African embassy attacks, which were only technically on American soil. Fleming says American soil is American soil.
• Broun questions whether the United States should serve as insurers for foreigners and pay for the “dastardly deeds” of terrorists. Fleming points out that the families of Americans who died would also receive payments.
• Broun, a former Marine, says the bill had nothing to do with military deaths, and using a military cemetery as a setting for the photo “trivializes the grief of families of fallen American heroes.” Fleming says three American soldiers died in the Kenya attack and Broun “should be ashamed … to claim that their sacrifice did not matter.”
• Broun says that co-sponsor Roy Blount, the House Minority Whip, is not upset with him because Blount just gave his campaign $3,000, and points out that both Georgia congressman Nathan Deal and deputy whip Eric Cantor voted against the bill. Fleming says political contributions shouldn’t sway Broun’s votes.
• Broun says it doesn’t matter because H.R. 2828, which BTW passed 409-12, is dead in the Senate. Fleming says that Broun is in the House, not the Senate, and “He should know, he already lost a race for the Senate.” (ouch!)
Broun closes by playing the trial lawyer card (this used to only work on Democrats). “As a trial lawyer, my opponent is used to twisting words,” he said. “He should have remembered the rule that when a witness is caught in a lie, then the jury has the right to expect that everything else he says is also a lie.”
What a way to spend my birthday – parsing the parsing of politicians. We’ve got another month of this ahead of us, folks. I’d advise all of you to stay away from your mailboxes as much as possible.
Happy Birthday
Well, you could have been in the Carnegie Hall of HS auditoriums watching Cowesert, Malcom and the BOE candidates - oops, wait you were.
Dan Matthews
Thanks
Back in my day, the auditorium was also known as the cafeteria, and it consisted of a linoleum floor, folding chairs and a wooden stage. That's what I call fiscal responsibility.
Oh, and OC school board, if you are going to model your auditorium after the Lincoln Center, people shouldn't need microphones to make themselves heard.
To wit, at my jr. high we
To wit, at my jr. high we ate in the "cafetorium"
It shared a stage with the gym! Like, it was a two-sided stage. Ghetto!
If Broun was the libertarian
If Broun was the libertarian minded guy he says he is, why's he up in arms about gay marriage??? Opps, he just a conservative like the rest, not a libertarian, except when it comes to porn. Wow...he's dynamic man.
Broun, Libertarians, and Marriage
The libertarian position is that the state should get out of the marriage business completely, not that gay marriage should be state-sanctioned.
Times have changed
That's also what Broun said last year.
Then he figured out that the religious-right account for a larger portion of the population in CD10 than libertarians.
Wedding Bells
Then he figured out that the religious-right account for a larger portion of the population in CD10 than libertarians
And marriage minded gays.
It probably is impossible to take an anti-gay stance that is too radical for the Tenth.
A Principled Man
I thought people support Paul Broun because he stands by his principles. Does he get a pass on this one because his original 'principle' was unpopular in the 10th district.
What about on abortion?
He's run for Congress as a
He's run for Congress as a pro-choice candidate before. Then again, that was before the far right established "the right to life" as the only issue that matters. And regardless of what anyone suggests, there is a contingent of this state that votes solely on whether a candidate is pro-life enough for them.
As long as they don't breed
It's too bad that all across the nation, for much of the electorate, politics (and consequently, the people they elect) have been reduced to single issues.
If I were running for Congress (or anything else except ACC commission) in the Tenth, I'd be against homosexual marriage too. It's not going to cost me any votes that I would get anyway, and I have to protect my right flank. Realistically, I know that nothing is going to be done at the national level anyway. At the local (and state level), nothing is going to change. So I can pretty much rail away, knowing that nothing I say will make much difference anyway.
Broun made a perfectly defensible vote on the internet provider bill, and now he is getting accused of being soft on child molesters. The connection is absurd.
Too bad for the Democrats that they have even more litmus tests that their candidates have pass.
I agree that Dems have them,
I agree that Dems have them, but more than the Right? Examples, plz.
Religious Right and Marriage
One day the "religious right" may realize that it is also in its interest to get the state out of the marriage business and return marriage to the church where it was for most of recorded history. Otherwise, it is inevitable that the state will extend the sanctioning of marriage to include all sorts of couples (or even n-tuples) to which most religious people would object.
Who you calling a liar?
I’m surprised that Paul Broun has played the trail layer card since he did so much work as a hired gun for malpractice attorneys during the time that he told his constituents that he has working exclusively doing house calls. I guess he was refering to the courthouse.
Anybody with one iota of intellectual honesty needs to look at Paul Broun’s disclosure and ask themselves ‘What would happen to me if I lied on my resume?’
http://www.snapdrive.net/files/546501/BrounDisclosure.pdf
Not so always prepared.
"trail layer"
Aren't those the Boy Scouts. Is Broun killing them too.
Paul Broun gets off
Paul Broun gets off on a technicality…again.
Politics & money make strange bedfellows ( metaphorical sense)
BTW, I looked at the disclosure form, and it is a matter of supreme irony that the "trail layers" for whom Broun was the "hired gun" are major supporters of John Barrow. I wonder if Fleming can make something of that.
It's more likely
It's more likely that Fleming will make an issue of the fact that two-thirds of Dr. Broun's income came from very obviously not "house-call" sources.
To this day, Paul Broun's campaign and congressional web-sites claim that his practice was exclusively house-calls until he was elected.
Paul Broun ought to know that when a politician is caught in a lie, then his constituents have the right to expect that everything else he says is also a lie.
Yes he could do that
Well, I guess in fact that Fleming could make the issue if he were ignorant enough not to know the difference between a practice and income. Maybe he is, I don't know.
I disagree. If you say
I disagree. If you say you're a full-time house call doctor and you're calling your opponent a liar for twisting the facts (when it seems the Congressman doesn't know the facts himself), then it seems fair for Fleming to ask, "you said you were a full-time doctor, so how do you explain all this money coming to you from law firms?" He should be asking it.
As the other poster points out, if you're going to call your opponent a liar, make sure what comes out of your mouth is 100% true or else you'll lose your credibility in the process.
Probably a first in the history of the world
Yeah, I guess P. Broun is the first person ever to have a full time job/practice and take in side work for some extra money. I'm sure that is going to be a hot issue with the voters.
I hope Fleming spends lots of time and campaign resources on whether Broun had "a unique practice of full time house calls."
If I were on that campaign
If I were on that campaign staff, I wouldn't bother spending money on the issue. I'd bring it up in debates and during interviews, though.
If Barry could use his
If Barry could use his legal-ese to work around the red tape and unveil to all why DR. Broun was stripped of his rights to hold private practice in the state of Georgia.
Why don't we just make something up
DR. Broun was stripped of his rights to hold private practice in the state of Georgia.
I guess the fact that the above statement is totally, absolutely, and demonstrably false is insignificant.
Why don't you accuse him of being Osama Bin Laden's personal physician.
Dr. Broun's licensure status is easily ascertainable at the website for the Georgia Composite Board of Medical Examiners.
As you don't seem to care enough to check the facts, I'll not bother giving you the link.
Why isn't he allowed to
Why isn't he allowed to practice in hospitals? Why does he no longer have his own private practice?
Its not because he just loves doing house calls, no one makes as much as his purported personal finances by doing just house calls.
You talk with people in the medical community (Georgia's largest association of doctors actually endoresed Barry)... especially those in and around Athens and Americus... Broun isn't the "friendly doctor" he portrays himself as.
Correction, he's an overly friendly doctor.
Tread lightly
I've heard those rumors, too, and never found proof.
Let's make something else up, why don't we
Again, the online records of the Georgia Composite Board of Medical Examiners shows that Dr. Broun has staff privileges at St. Mary's Hospital. If I cared enough, I suppose that this information could be verified with a phone call.
There are any number of doctors in the Athens area that only have staff privileges at one or the other of the hospitals. I'm not sure of the mechanics, but I'm sure there is some reason. My very own physician for years only had staff privileges at St. Mary's, a fact which he made known by posters all over his office.
As to why he no longer has his practice, this is just a wild guess on my part, but I'm betting that it is real hard to have a practice based on house calls when you are in Washington, D.C. most of the year.
I personally am curious as to Kandrews expertise on the income potential of a medical practice based on house calls. Upon what evidence does he or she base the allegation that "no one makes as much . . . just by doing house calls." Who else do we know who just does house calls with whom we can compare financial records?
I find it interesting that exactly these kind of allegations have been expunged over on the news side by Melissa Hanna, but apparently the ABH condones them over here in the blogs.
I'm not referencing his
I'm not referencing his inability to practice medicine now that he's a congressman... although he does make time to see his patients while back in the district on the weekends. I'm talking about all the years he spent as the only doctor in Georgia who makes house calls prior to his campaign in 2007 (you know, a couple months before Charlie Norwood died).
(By the way, per his wife Nikki, Paul likes to hug his patients and call them "sugar")
Broun can't possibly make the kind of dough serving 20 people with house calls that it would take to run himself into 200,000 dollars of campaign debt.
Also interesting, just got back from a drive from Columbia, SC to Athens... passed through Augusta, nothing but Fleming signs... all along GA 15 through Greensboro and clear into Watkinsville, Fleming signs outnumbered Broun signs about 6 to 1. Someone is starting to look a bit more legit than Paul Broun's self-polling would have us believe.
Smothered and covered
(By the way, per his wife Nikki, Paul likes to hug his patients and call them "sugar")
So is this going to be a big campaign issue? The waitresses at the Waffle House do the same thing.
Happy birthday, Blake. I
Happy birthday, Blake.
I didn't get the Fleming mailer, but I would like to see it if anyone has a copy.
I am probably torn on this issue. I don't think military cemeteries should be used in mailers, but it sounds like Broun didn't do his research if you read the Fleming responses to the Broun objections in this post. If he had, he surely wouldn't have made the comment about no military deaths when there seems to have been some.
I don't understand the argument about Roy Blunt. What does his campaign contribution have to do with the issue of embassy attacks or helping the family members of those victims?
Finally, if Fleming is able to point out that Broun was wrong, doesn't his argument about "if something is a lie, then everything is a lie" fall at his feet, too?
What a strange back-and-forth.
I thought so too
And their little Punch-and-Judy show moves so fast that just reading and fact-checking their press releases honestly could be a full-time job. If Broun votes for a bill that's co-sponsored by a guy whose college roommate's brother went to law school with a California Supreme Court justice, does that make him gay? If Fleming leaves out an apostrophe in one of his mailers, does that mean he hates the troops? I need an intern to answer these pressing questions and more.
The Banner-Herald won't even
The Banner-Herald won't even give you an intern? Times are tough, my friend.
If it's not on Google, is it real?
Some of the facts sort of boggle the mind. Where would you look to find the occupations of all the Americans killed in the embassy bombings?
And given the interplay between the military and the diplomatic corps, how would you ever be really sure that someone was or wasn't in the military.
Huh. CNN still has the
Huh. CNN still has the victim profiles up on their web site.
http://www.cnn.com/US/9808/13/bomb.victims.profile/
Everything's on Google
http://www.cnn.com/US/9808/13/bomb.victims.profile/
Well there you go.
Well there you go.
Cemeterygate
Jim Galloway caught wind of Cemeterygate this morning. He has a jpg.