Attention, ladies: DuBose Porter is pro-life

Blake Aued's picture

But the Democratic gubernatorial candidate says he’s not going to make a big deal out of it.

Porter, the House minority leader from Dublin, is a hard man to pin down on abortion. That’s not surprising, given that he’s stuck between a conservative, religious rural constituency and statewide ambitions that involve appealing to a more liberal, female, urban audience as well.

Talking to Porter about biotech research this afternoon, I prefaced a question about embryonic stem cells by asking him whether he was pro-life or pro-choice.

“I don’t know if that’s where government needs to be,” he dodged.

I pressed a little bit, and he said he believes abortion ought to be legal in cases of rape, incest or to save the mother’s life. So, otherwise, you’re pro-life, then, right? Right, he said, but with the caveat that state governments don’t have much control over the issue.

“I really think this is something that ought to be handled in the courts later,” he said.

Then, reiterating that abortion isn’t a priority for him, he skillfully steered the conversation back to what he really wanted to talk about.

“I think when people are better-educated, there are fewer abortions,” he said. “I’m going to put the emphasis of my administration on education.”

I looked some of Porter’s past stances on abortion, and from what I can tell, he’s never been crystal clear about it. For example, on a 2005 Bobby Franklin bill that would have made abortion a felony, Porter said, "The problem is, it's misleading to voters to pretend we can ban abortion here. Whether we personally agree or not, the Supreme Court has said it's legal. And I think when you get into cases like rape or incest there's a lot of people who think it should be up to the woman on that."

That's a lot of wiggle room he left himself there.

I talked to a few plugged-in folks about this, and reaction varied wildly. One operative in a rival campaign said he thought Porter’s been pretty consistent on abortion over the years, another said he’s been dodging it for years, and a long-time Porter supporter said he was absolutely floored. So I don’t really know what to make of it, but there you go.

Facebook. Twitter. E-mail.

Tags
Comments

Voters...

Will we really choose a Governor based on one issue over which he has very little control?

No wonder we're in this handbasket...

No, I don't think so, but

No, I don't think so, but for Democratic women who are on the fence, this could tip them toward another candidate. It may help him among the remaining conservative Dems in South Georgia, though.

State governments don't have

State governments don't have much control over the issue? They certainly do -- this is where all of the action is right now. Waiting periods, having to see an ultrasound, having to hear the doctor narrate the ultrasound to you, the whole abortions based on race, sex, gender deal, etc., etc. That Porter is ambivalent - at best - about this issue makes a huge difference to me as a voter.

Thanks for pushing him on it, Blake.

Title is Misleading

Blake, your own article states "I pressed a little bit, and he said he believes abortion ought to be legal in cases of rape, incest or to save the mother’s life."

I don't really know any candidate that is "pro-abortion." I don't think anyone really likes the idea of abortion happening. I think we should look for candidates who want to reduce the number of abortions without making it a crime.

Also in your article, Dubose said "Whether we personally agree or not, the Supreme Court has said it's legal."

I think the article and title are misleading and misrepresent the candidate on the issue. Perhaps you should contact the campaign and get an actual, through explanation on his beliefs. Would make for a better story than this one which is just an attention-grabber.

In fact, it might be a good idea to get all the candidates explanation on the issue.

People who are in favour of

People who are in favour of abortion remaining legal are pro-abortion. I know many candidates that are pro-abortion.

You quoted: "Whether we personally agree or not, the Supreme Court has said it's legal." Didn't they say the same thing about slavery? The Supreme Court, I believe, once ruled that black people did not have any rights that the white man was bound to respect. Does that mean that legislators and governors should have just given up because "Whether we personally agree or not, the Supreme Court has said it's legal?"

*sigh*

Yes, yes, and people who are in favor of abolishing access to abortion are "anti-choice".

Do you really want to start the lets-throw-pejoratives-at-our-opponents game? I can't think of a quicker way of turning this thread into yet another house of feces. Please keep the conversation productive and centered on the political effects of Porter's announcement. Thanks.